Return to front page

Newest article: Fund our Future plea by johnnybaker26/4 16:10Fri Apr 26 16:10:49 2024view thread

Oldest article: "Hither & Thither"? by alan ainsworth24/11/2013 12:59Sun Nov 24 12:59:08 2013view thread


Next thread: Peacehaven Away by John Rice28/1/2015 07:38Wed Jan 28 07:38:55 2015view thread

Thank heavens (which opened last night)

By David B (legacy user)26/1/2015 14:01Mon Jan 26 14:01:01 2015

Views: 3192

Having seen the state of the pitch at the beginning and end of play on Saturday, I am not entirely sure the match should have been given the go-ahead in the morning.

I know it was towards the end of the game, but I watched when one of our long clearances had both height and distance the ball barely bounced off the pitch. On a normal surface it would probably have bounced to waist/chest height and on a rock hard pitch to head height or higher; this one didn't get to knee height (Leon Smith’s knee height, not Charlie Goode’s, in case you were wondering).

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Thank heavens (which opened last night)

By John Fordham (legacy user)26/1/2015 18:39Mon Jan 26 18:39:39 2015In response to Thank heavens (which opened last night)Top of thread

Views: 3050

I disagree, David. If at all possible I believe that a game should be played as otherwise fixture congestion results. I don't see the difference between playing on a muddy pitch, playing in high winds or playing on a rock hard pitch - all affect the ability to play good football. I wasn't able to get to Saturday's game but from reading reports it was entertaining and so a good game can be played in adverse conditions.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Player safety

By David B (legacy user)27/1/2015 13:18Tue Jan 27 13:18:22 2015In response to Re: Thank heavens (which opened last night)Top of thread

Views: 3052

In the most part, I believe that games should go ahead if possible. One small frozen patch, or a little patch of bad ground, unless in the middle of the penalty area, should not be a reason to call off a game. However, if the overall pitch is in such a bad condition that the players’ safety is compromised, then games should not go ahead. My honest opinion of the pitch on Saturday was that it was not fit. I reckon there were at least half a dozen places where the pitch was unsafe - there is no blame on the groundsman, who had done what he could to get the pitch playable - and that is too many.

There were two examples on Saturday that I feel back me up. A few minutes from the end, we cleared a ball 30 or 40 yards downfield and it went probably 20-25 feet in the air at its highest point. When the ball landed, it bounced not only to less than knee height but also at an angle as if it had been deflected. A couple of minutes later, a Ks player, trying to turn, but under no pressure, went down and got up limping - it certainly didn't look like cramp.

A few years ago a player suffered a ruptured achilles tendon that was almost certainly caused by playing too many games in quick succession on very heavy pitches (that is what the surgeon told him). If we had played last night, any of the starters who made it two full games in three days would not have had sufficient recovery time. This is when players become susceptible to serious injury, and the extra 24 hours for the game next Tuesday will make a huge difference.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Player safety

By John Fordham (legacy user)27/1/2015 21:21Tue Jan 27 21:21:15 2015In response to Player safetyTop of thread

Views: 2983

Have to agree, David. Player safety is of great importance. Can't comment on last Saturday's pitch as wasn't there but must have been a difficult decision for ref, as it must be in cases such as hard pitches. As it turned out, was right decision as (I believe) no-one seriously injured, Hendon won and one less game to play. All adds weight to the argument for having 3G pithes where ref doesn't have such difficult decsions to make.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Don't stop

By Jeff Hill (legacy user)27/1/2015 22:05Tue Jan 27 22:05:40 2015In response to Re: Player safetyTop of thread

Views: 3111

Come on David, your turn. Don't stop now.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Don't stop

By David B (legacy user)28/1/2015 12:11Wed Jan 28 12:11:59 2015In response to Don't stopTop of thread

Views: 3047

Why? John F has agreed with my observations.

I watched a match in the Essex Senior League last night, Waltham Forest v Hullbridge Sports, at Wadham Lodge. The pitch was heavily sanded in places and bumpy in others, but in no way was it unplayable. What I got was 90+ minutes of pulsating entertainment, honest endeavour and two excellent goalkeeping performances. It would have been one of the best 0-0s I have ever watched until Waltham Forest converted a penalty two minutes into second-half stoppage time.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Don't stop

By John Fordham (legacy user)28/1/2015 08:44Wed Jan 28 08:44:11 2015In response to Don't stopTop of thread

Views: 2992

Wind-up merchant!!!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Previous thread: One for the stattos by Paul Butler23/1/2015 16:06Fri Jan 23 16:06:39 2015view thread