ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: On this day feature by David B25/2 18:57Thu Feb 25 18:57:41 2021view thread

Oldest article: Lowestoft away by Malc29/8/2013 19:10Thu Aug 29 19:10:33 2013view thread


Reply to "Re: Burgess Hill - Underlying aquese"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Burgess Hill - Underlying aquese

By rwakeley12/11/2017 01:27Sun Nov 12 01:27:10 2017In response to Re: Burgess Hill

Views: 1822

Beyond the headline - not much revealed. Tom's distribution and Bid Dave's contribution. Pre-match determination 50/50 balance team composition. Midfield scenario remains questionable. I personally don't think we've been quite right post Enfield, despite the performance - today may have been the ideal fixture to re-align the necessary pre-requisite - nothing beyond that. Spot on application, credit for that. A move in the right direction, an opportunity, with the similar disposition next week, to strive forward.

Edited by rwakeley at 01:43:38 on 12th November 2017
Edited by rwakeley at 01:46:14 on 12th November 2017