Return to front page

Newest article: Wealdstone the benchmark by rwakeley11/5 02:14Sun May 11 02:14:27 2025view thread

Oldest article: Travel to Grays by Jeff Hill7/12/2013 08:50Sat Dec 7 08:50:27 2013view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: McCann v Mckimm"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: McCann v Mckimm

By rwakeley14/8/2017 18:19Mon Aug 14 18:19:46 2017In response to Re: McCann v Mckimm

Views: 3236

I agree wholesale - I think the Gaffer's done an exceptional job. Impressive performance Saturday. Bit more clinical, we would have won. Two lad's to come back in midfield will galvanize us. The elephant in the room for me is accommodating Niko up-front, with Kezie missing out.
After a couple of in-different campaigns, it's nice to feel some genuine optimism. A couple of positive results will bring enhanced confidence. We dominated spells of the game Saturday - it's been some time since I've thought that.
One Hendon fan I spoke to with regards to Marcel considered him an 'impact' player. I think that is an excellent point. When chasing games, something different, maybe a missing component. Vital points were gained late on through substitutions and going blitzkrieg.
We owe it to ourselves to fulfil our potential - our work-rate at Tonbridge was outstanding, replicate that standard consistently and we're in business.