Re: Sadly we've been here before...
Views: 3981
The ref/lino gave it 'cause they celebrated so hard. They probably thought it must be a goal. Surely you only give a goal is you are 100% sure it's crossed the line otherwise no goal. Look, whichever team gets that goal given against them is gonna have the hump for sure. Just happened to be us. When you're down you get the worst of the decisions and all that. Have to move - on 4 games left 2 wins and a draw needed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmF5PSGpLA8 - our pen.
- Tonbridge by PF1/4/2017 11:33Sat Apr 1 11:33:26 2017view thread
- Re: Tonbridge by PF1/4/2017 15:52Sat Apr 1 15:52:24 2017
- Re: Tonbridge by PF1/4/2017 16:23Sat Apr 1 16:23:29 2017
- Re: 1-1 by PF1/4/2017 16:27Sat Apr 1 16:27:21 2017
- Re: 1-1 by PF1/4/2017 16:34Sat Apr 1 16:34:24 2017
- Re: squeaky bum time by PF1/4/2017 16:45Sat Apr 1 16:45:33 2017
- Re: Sadly we've been here before... by PF1/4/2017 18:03Sat Apr 1 18:03:05 2017
- Re: Sadly we've been here before... by David B1/4/2017 19:50Sat Apr 1 19:50:14 2017
- Re: Sadly we've been here before... by Lamb_n_flag3/4/2017 14:17Mon Apr 3 14:17:18 2017
- Re: Sadly we've been here before... by PF3/4/2017 16:29Mon Apr 3 16:29:58 2017
- Re: Now this is interesting by PF1/4/2017 20:57Sat Apr 1 20:57:42 2017
- Re: Now this is interesting by Paul Butler4/4/2017 10:40Tue Apr 4 10:40:38 2017
- Re: Now this is interesting by John Rogers4/4/2017 10:55Tue Apr 4 10:55:49 2017
- Re: Now this is interesting by Paul Butler4/4/2017 21:35Tue Apr 4 21:35:00 2017
- Re: Now this is interesting by embee1/4/2017 21:11Sat Apr 1 21:11:02 2017
- Re: Now this is interesting by SteveHFC1/4/2017 21:38Sat Apr 1 21:38:33 2017
- Re: Now this is interesting by SteveHFC1/4/2017 22:19Sat Apr 1 22:19:39 2017
- Monitoring FWP by rwakeley2/4/2017 12:12Sun Apr 2 12:12:08 2017
- Re: Ok so table is revised... by PF2/4/2017 11:38Sun Apr 2 11:38:51 2017
- Re: K's won 2-0 by PF4/4/2017 08:56Tue Apr 4 08:56:01 2017
- Re: Leatherhead drew 1-1 by PF5/4/2017 11:02Wed Apr 5 11:02:23 2017
- Re: Now this is interesting - no it isn't by rwakeley2/4/2017 00:15Sun Apr 2 00:15:12 2017
- Re: Now this is interesting - no it isn't by ChrisHFC2/4/2017 15:50Sun Apr 2 15:50:06 2017