ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: On this day feature by David B25/2 18:57Thu Feb 25 18:57:41 2021view thread

Oldest article: Lowestoft away by Malc29/8/2013 19:10Thu Aug 29 19:10:33 2013view thread


Reply to "Re: Should have had 5 or 6"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Should have had 5 or 6

By Paul Butler (legacy user)10/9/2013 12:57Tue Sep 10 12:57:13 2013In response to Should have had 5 or 6

Views: 3372

Harrow were terrible, definitely down there with Enfield, Wingate and Thamesmead as the worst sides I've seen so far, and we should have been 4 or 5 up by half time. The second half was more of the same, while we looked worryingly exposed on the counter attack, our forwards tormented their defence, nice to see the 6 score an own goal after he really should have given us two penalties, the handball in the first half and the wrestling of Jefferson in the second, which the linesman unbelievably gave him a free kick for. I've seen enough games now this season to know we won't be in any relegation danger, but unless we improve dramatically defensively I think mid table mediocrity is our limit.