ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Excellent news by The Ancient One27/3 10:36Sat Mar 27 10:36:29 2021view thread

Oldest article: Cheap Train Fares to Bury by SteveHFC30/8/2013 09:25Fri Aug 30 09:25:38 2013view thread


Next thread: Testing testing by Dessie12/10/2020 23:12Mon Oct 12 23:12:18 2020view thread

Re: Maidstone

By rwakeley4/10/2020 00:11Sun Oct 4 00:11:53 2020In response to Maidstone

Views: 574

Last week for me, we struggled to match them tactically. A high line gave them a commanding stance. Today, seeing them at the back, I thought we were in with a shout. I maintain the key take away is what we do. I think we have to impose ourselves more from playing out from the back. I thought we could have been a tad more adventurous in our play. I do think there are a few niggles at home and it's not too early to draw coclusions. Nor thy,s distributions. We win them, we progress, they dominated the air battle and launched a succession of raids. Today, the positives override. The best is clearly yet to come. The lads at ch for me were solid. Hard to tell apart in terms of perceived standard. I thought Sean played a solid all round game. We have to get more out of our wide lads. I often wonder in this instance if their starting positions is too high. I want to see these lads unleashed. Overall take, things to work on but the upside and potential of these lads is enticing. Someone is going to get a thrashing one of these days. Cracking set of lads. We are certainly on the right track. Keep at it.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Hayes by rwakeley7/10/2020 20:51Wed Oct 7 20:51:35 2020

Previous thread: Well played Gaffer... by rwakeley5/9/2020 23:32Sat Sep 5 23:32:26 2020view thread