Return to front page

Newest article: rwakeley by Dessie14/9 13:04Wed Sep 14 13:04:46 2022view thread

Oldest article: Bideford getting excuses in early by Paul Butler30/10/2013 01:32Wed Oct 30 01:32:46 2013view thread


Next thread: Tough Trophy draw by Mike Cox13/11/2017 13:06Mon Nov 13 13:06:30 2017view thread

Re: Burgess Hill - Underlying aquese

By rwakeley12/11/2017 01:27Sun Nov 12 01:27:10 2017In response to Re: Burgess Hill

Views: 2350

Beyond the headline - not much revealed. Tom's distribution and Bid Dave's contribution. Pre-match determination 50/50 balance team composition. Midfield scenario remains questionable. I personally don't think we've been quite right post Enfield, despite the performance - today may have been the ideal fixture to re-align the necessary pre-requisite - nothing beyond that. Spot on application, credit for that. A move in the right direction, an opportunity, with the similar disposition next week, to strive forward.

Edited by rwakeley at 01:43:38 on 12th November 2017
Edited by rwakeley at 01:46:14 on 12th November 2017

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Burgess Hill - Underlying aquese by David B12/11/2017 13:42Sun Nov 12 13:42:31 2017

Previous thread: Kingstonian by PF4/11/2017 20:04Sat Nov 4 20:04:05 2017view thread