ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Excellent news by The Ancient One27/3 10:36Sat Mar 27 10:36:29 2021view thread

Oldest article: Cheap Train Fares to Bury by SteveHFC30/8/2013 09:25Fri Aug 30 09:25:38 2013view thread


Next thread: Tough Trophy draw by Mike Cox13/11/2017 13:06Mon Nov 13 13:06:30 2017view thread

Re: Burgess Hill - Underlying aquese

By rwakeley12/11/2017 01:27Sun Nov 12 01:27:10 2017In response to Re: Burgess Hill

Views: 1878

Beyond the headline - not much revealed. Tom's distribution and Bid Dave's contribution. Pre-match determination 50/50 balance team composition. Midfield scenario remains questionable. I personally don't think we've been quite right post Enfield, despite the performance - today may have been the ideal fixture to re-align the necessary pre-requisite - nothing beyond that. Spot on application, credit for that. A move in the right direction, an opportunity, with the similar disposition next week, to strive forward.

Edited by rwakeley at 01:43:38 on 12th November 2017
Edited by rwakeley at 01:46:14 on 12th November 2017

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Burgess Hill - Underlying aquese by David B12/11/2017 13:42Sun Nov 12 13:42:31 2017

Previous thread: Kingstonian by PF4/11/2017 20:04Sat Nov 4 20:04:05 2017view thread