Return to front page

Newest article: Re: PA system at SJP by ktfcprogrammes7328/9/2023 23:09Thu Sep 28 23:09:24 2023view thread

Oldest article: "Hither & Thither"? by alan ainsworth24/11/2013 12:59Sun Nov 24 12:59:08 2013view thread


Next thread: Folkestone - DD Day! by PF8/4/2017 12:29Sat Apr 8 12:29:16 2017view thread

Re: Now this is interesting - no it isn't

By rwakeley2/4/2017 00:15Sun Apr 2 00:15:12 2017In response to Re: Now this is interesting

Views: 3517

Tonbridge were a far more solid, competent outfit. Let's keep a sense of perspective. They were far stronger physically and played a more resounding game. To debate a contentious decision is frankly disguising events, which is also detrimental to our own efforts. We were simply beaten by a better side.
One could equally argue that Billers could have had a handball related penalty post our home victory stoppage time effort - I've seen them given. I personally believe we may have got away with one. You generally get what you deserve. As Robert Falcon Scott proclaimed facing his fate on the artic - "No complaints" - they knew the risks they were undertaking.
We still have a shout, and the lads have demonstrated they have a fighting chance.
The lads gave everything. Arthur was a stand-out amongst what must be one of the most challenging front-lines we would face. Don't go looking for excuses.
I personally would advocate it's two from four - forget today, it's gone, concentrate on what lies ahead.

Edited by rwakeley at 00:16:43 on 2nd April 2017

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Now this is interesting - no it isn't by ChrisHFC2/4/2017 15:50Sun Apr 2 15:50:06 2017

Previous thread: AFC Sudbury get the points by rwakeley30/3/2017 15:33Thu Mar 30 15:33:49 2017view thread