Greensnet - Forum

Newest article: Fund our Future plea by johnnybaker26/4 16:10Fri Apr 26 16:10:49 2024view thread

Oldest article: "Hither & Thither"? by alan ainsworth24/11/2013 12:59Sun Nov 24 12:59:08 2013view thread

Next thread: Folkestone - DD Day! by PF8/4/2017 12:29Sat Apr 8 12:29:16 2017view thread

Re: Now this is interesting - no it isn't

By rwakeley2/4/2017 00:15Sun Apr 2 00:15:12 2017In response to Re: Now this is interesting

Tonbridge were a far more solid, competent outfit. Let's keep a sense of perspective. They were far stronger physically and played a more resounding game. To debate a contentious decision is frankly disguising events, which is also detrimental to our own efforts. We were simply beaten by a better side.
One could equally argue that Billers could have had a handball related penalty post our home victory stoppage time effort - I've seen them given. I personally believe we may have got away with one. You generally get what you deserve. As Robert Falcon Scott proclaimed facing his fate on the artic - "No complaints" - they knew the risks they were undertaking.
We still have a shout, and the lads have demonstrated they have a fighting chance.
The lads gave everything. Arthur was a stand-out amongst what must be one of the most challenging front-lines we would face. Don't go looking for excuses.
I personally would advocate it's two from four - forget today, it's gone, concentrate on what lies ahead.

Edited by rwakeley at 00:16:43 on 2nd April 2017

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Now this is interesting - no it isn't by ChrisHFC2/4/2017 15:50Sun Apr 2 15:50:06 2017

Tonbridge Tonbridge by PF1/4/2017 11:33Sat Apr 1 11:33:26 2017view thread
Re: Tonbridge by PF1/4/2017 15:52Sat Apr 1 15:52:24 2017
Re: Tonbridge by PF1/4/2017 16:23Sat Apr 1 16:23:29 2017
Re: 1-1 by PF1/4/2017 16:27Sat Apr 1 16:27:21 2017
Re: 1-1 by PF1/4/2017 16:34Sat Apr 1 16:34:24 2017
Re: squeaky bum time by PF1/4/2017 16:45Sat Apr 1 16:45:33 2017
Re: Sadly we've been here before... by PF1/4/2017 18:03Sat Apr 1 18:03:05 2017
Re: Sadly we've been here before... by David B1/4/2017 19:50Sat Apr 1 19:50:14 2017
Re: Sadly we've been here before... by Lamb_n_flag3/4/2017 14:17Mon Apr 3 14:17:18 2017
Re: Sadly we've been here before... by PF3/4/2017 16:29Mon Apr 3 16:29:58 2017
Re: Now this is interesting by PF1/4/2017 20:57Sat Apr 1 20:57:42 2017
Re: Now this is interesting by Paul Butler4/4/2017 10:40Tue Apr 4 10:40:38 2017
Re: Now this is interesting by John Rogers4/4/2017 10:55Tue Apr 4 10:55:49 2017
Re: Now this is interesting by Paul Butler4/4/2017 21:35Tue Apr 4 21:35:00 2017
Re: Now this is interesting by embee1/4/2017 21:11Sat Apr 1 21:11:02 2017
Re: Now this is interesting by SteveHFC1/4/2017 21:38Sat Apr 1 21:38:33 2017
Re: Now this is interesting by SteveHFC1/4/2017 22:19Sat Apr 1 22:19:39 2017
Monitoring FWP by rwakeley2/4/2017 12:12Sun Apr 2 12:12:08 2017
Re: Ok so table is revised... by PF2/4/2017 11:38Sun Apr 2 11:38:51 2017
Re: K's won 2-0 by PF4/4/2017 08:56Tue Apr 4 08:56:01 2017
Re: Leatherhead drew 1-1 by PF5/4/2017 11:02Wed Apr 5 11:02:23 2017
Re: Now this is interesting - no it isn't by rwakeley2/4/2017 00:15Sun Apr 2 00:15:12 2017
Re: Now this is interesting - no it isn't by ChrisHFC2/4/2017 15:50Sun Apr 2 15:50:06 2017
23 articles by 9 users; views: 90781; latest: Re: Leatherhead drew 1-1 by PF5/4/2017 11:02Wed Apr 5 11:02:23 2017

Previous thread: AFC Sudbury get the points by rwakeley30/3/2017 15:33Thu Mar 30 15:33:49 2017view thread

This forum is provided by Forums.Football Web Pages.co.ukcontact | pricing | privacy | refunds