Re: AFC Sudbury get the points
Views: 3058
The League's decision doesn't set a precedent, dangerous or not, it follows a previously set precedent.
Somewhere in the original comments following the match Dave Ballheimer (I think) gave the example of Wingate & Finchley having five players dismissed, with the immediate abandonment of the match, and in due course the score at abandonment standing. There have also been previous examples of abandonment due to a mass confrontation, with the score at abandonment standing.
Surely what we want from the league in these situations, few as they may be over the years, is consistency, and that's exactly what we've got.
Whether we like it or not, and whether we feel we've been unfairly treated, is another matter entirely.
Edited by ChrisHFC at 16:40:12 on 31st March 2017
Next article in this thread: Re: AFC Sudbury get the points by Lamb_n_flag31/3/2017 15:07Fri Mar 31 15:07:43 2017
AFC Sudbury get the points by rwakeley30/3/2017 15:33Thu Mar 30 15:33:49 2017view thread- Re: AFC Sudbury get the points by John Rogers30/3/2017 19:19Thu Mar 30 19:19:03 2017
- Re: AFC Sudbury get the points by Paul Butler31/3/2017 11:53Fri Mar 31 11:53:38 2017
- Re: AFC Sudbury get the points by ChrisHFC31/3/2017 16:39Fri Mar 31 16:39:08 2017
- Re: AFC Sudbury get the points by Lamb_n_flag31/3/2017 15:07Fri Mar 31 15:07:43 2017
- Re: AFC Sudbury get the points by rwakeley31/3/2017 20:16Fri Mar 31 20:16:52 2017
- Re: AFC Sudbury get the points by dw31/3/2017 22:41Fri Mar 31 22:41:50 2017