ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Poole - Pre-match baguette by John RogersToday 10:13Today at 10:13:19view thread

Oldest article: Awards Night by HendonJohn5/5/2013 19:04Sun May 5 19:04:40 2013view thread


Next thread: Tonbridge by PF1/4/2017 11:33Sat Apr 1 11:33:26 2017view thread

Re: AFC Sudbury get the points

By ChrisHFC31/3/2017 16:39Fri Mar 31 16:39:08 2017In response to Re: AFC Sudbury get the points

Views: 1393

The League's decision doesn't set a precedent, dangerous or not, it follows a previously set precedent.

Somewhere in the original comments following the match Dave Ballheimer (I think) gave the example of Wingate & Finchley having five players dismissed, with the immediate abandonment of the match, and in due course the score at abandonment standing. There have also been previous examples of abandonment due to a mass confrontation, with the score at abandonment standing.

Surely what we want from the league in these situations, few as they may be over the years, is consistency, and that's exactly what we've got.

Whether we like it or not, and whether we feel we've been unfairly treated, is another matter entirely.

Edited by ChrisHFC at 16:40:12 on 31st March 2017

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: AFC Sudbury get the points by Lamb_n_flag31/3/2017 15:07Fri Mar 31 15:07:43 2017

Previous thread: Congratulations to Marcel by David B22/3/2017 13:17Wed Mar 22 13:17:27 2017view thread