ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Excellent news by The Ancient One27/3 10:36Sat Mar 27 10:36:29 2021view thread

Oldest article: Cheap Train Fares to Bury by SteveHFC30/8/2013 09:25Fri Aug 30 09:25:38 2013view thread


Next thread: HELP WANTED by David B28/10/2016 17:49Fri Oct 28 17:49:39 2016view thread

Jekyll & Hyde performances

By David B26/10/2016 12:49Wed Oct 26 12:49:27 2016

Views: 1649

That would be an understatement comparing Saturday and last night. Plumpton may be only one stop down the line, but we were not at the races against Burgess Hill and it was hugely disappointing (which some might consider to be a euphamism!).

I know we weren’t at full strength, but speaking to Gary this morning, here are seven players (in alphabetical order) missing through injury or unavailability – not suspended – last night: Alfie, Andre, Dale, Dave, Karl, Kevin and Ollie. I accept that all seven would not have started, but I reckon at least four would have and the other three may well have been in the 16.

Does this excuse the awfulness of the performance? No, not in my opinion, but it is a pretty strong mitigating factor.

If it hadn’t been for Billy Collings, Burgess Hill would have been out of sight by half-time and Keagan nearly snatched a stoppage time equaliser which probably would have been the most unjustified draw we would have gained this decade.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Jekyll & Hyde performances by rwakeley26/10/2016 15:06Wed Oct 26 15:06:06 2016

Previous thread: Today by John Rogers22/10/2016 21:26Sat Oct 22 21:26:45 2016view thread