Return to front page

Newest article: Re: The Future by Jake HendonLoyal4/2 19:03Sat Feb 4 19:03:40 2023view thread

Oldest article: Memories of 66 by John Richardson by John Rice17/11/2013 20:14Sun Nov 17 20:14:06 2013view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Loyalty by Mike Cox16/11/2015 15:28Mon Nov 16 15:28:55 2015view thread

Re: Balance

By rwakeley15/11/2015 11:07Sun Nov 15 11:07:54 2015In response to Balance

Views: 2702

Good healthy debate. Excellent post as always.
On the way home on the train last night I actually put down a near identical line-up. I changed the keeper of whom I think has excellent overall qualities and included Taggs, (I know he is injured). I prefer your option, but I would involve Taggs as I maintain he has shown better glimses of form. There's also the omission of Shults upon return which offers options and depth.
I really feel for the Gaffer, he has had an awful selection problem every week.
We need to get an established line-up that keeps us in contention and get drilled into performing consistently.
Looking at this there is cause for optimism.

Edited by rwakeley at 11:13:29 on 15th November 2015

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Balance by John Rogers15/11/2015 13:04Sun Nov 15 13:04:48 2015

Previous thread: I believe..... by mello11/11/2015 17:48Wed Nov 11 17:48:47 2015view thread