ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Excellent news by The Ancient One27/3 10:36Sat Mar 27 10:36:29 2021view thread

Oldest article: Cheap Train Fares to Bury by SteveHFC30/8/2013 09:25Fri Aug 30 09:25:38 2013view thread


Next thread: Website news by Hendonboy16/7/2015 10:17Thu Jul 16 10:17:37 2015view thread

Re: Misconduct Charge?

By rwakeley29/6/2015 11:00Mon Jun 29 11:00:34 2015In response to Re: Misconduct Charge?

Views: 3176

My personal reaction was more damage limitation. I maintain in all walks of public life when scandal (for want of a better word), hits, those at the top should always act quickly and decisively.
Their hands are probably tied, so I would in no means criticize anybody at the club. Just an acknowledgment may deflect any reputational damage to the club - that was more my concern.
I've read the charge and the recent comments made by Simon - as is the norm I thought he relayed the correct tone.
I like everybody else will have varied opinions on what has transpired and I consequently maintain that if anything should be presented post the final proceedings.
Not withstanding the severity of the events, we cannot let this have any negative impact on what we should all be concentrating on which is events on the pitch.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Misconduct Charge? by Paul Butler29/6/2015 15:57Mon Jun 29 15:57:36 2015

Previous thread: Association & Trust AGMs - Weds 22nd July by John Rogers7/7/2015 23:39Tue Jul 7 23:39:46 2015view thread