Return to front page

Newest article: Re: PA system at SJP by ktfcprogrammes7328/9/2023 23:09Thu Sep 28 23:09:24 2023view thread

Oldest article: "Hither & Thither"? by alan ainsworth24/11/2013 12:59Sun Nov 24 12:59:08 2013view thread


Next thread: Third Witham postponement by David B14/1/2015 13:34Wed Jan 14 13:34:04 2015view thread

Re: Interesting idea, but here's why it is not possible

By John Fordham (legacy user)13/1/2015 15:37Tue Jan 13 15:37:01 2015In response to Interesting idea, but here's why it is not possible

Views: 3587

You're mis-understanding what I am saying, David, or I'm mis-understanding what you are saying. I'm agreeing that it should be the match ref's decision. My suggestion is that the groundsman conveys information to the match ref - whether that includes pictures or not - and then it is the match referee's decision whether to (1) call off based upon information given or (2) decide whether he/she needs to personally inspect pitch. I can easily imagine a scenario where a pitch is partially underwater at, say, 3 hours in advance of kick-off and it is totally obvious that a game cannot be played - why does the ref need to be there personally to make a decision - no need at all, in my opinion.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Oh by David B13/1/2015 16:39Tue Jan 13 16:39:47 2015

Previous thread: Anthony Thomas by richhend12/1/2015 22:10Mon Jan 12 22:10:57 2015view thread