Disallowed goal
Views: 3965
The ball was headed goalwards by Lee O'Leary, who ran from behind his defender so, in my opinion could not be offside in any circumstance.
Kezie and, I think, Leon Smith ran in hoping for a rebound, deflection or half-save by the goalkeeper. I was not sure whether goalkeeper fumbled the ball forward into Kezie or straight against the post before it rebounded off his body and into the net.
People around me think the ball hit Kezie, in which case he was offside and, as he touched the ball (or it touched him - either way, it is irrelevant), he was in an active offside position. If, however, the ball had gone against only the goalkeeper and goalpost then Kezie and Leon should have been considered passive.
My instinct is that the ball made contact with Kezie, so the assistant referee almost certainly got the decision correct.
By the way, this was actually very different to Ollie Sprague's goal on Monday. Any players in an offside position on Monday were passive because they did not affect the ball's path after Ollie struck it and their position did not change Charlie Horlock's failure to make a save - the deflection did that more than adequately. In Monday's case, the referee, who had a very different angle, realised that the offside players were passive and discussed the situation with his assistant. Once it became clear that the deflection was off a defender and not one of the offside players, the referee correctly overruled his assistant.
Next article in this thread: Re; Bogey team wins again by mike cox31/8/2014 17:35Sun Aug 31 17:35:28 2014
Bogey team wins again by mike cox30/8/2014 20:41Sat Aug 30 20:41:58 2014view thread
- Re: Bogey team wins again by SteveHFC30/8/2014 21:59Sat Aug 30 21:59:44 2014
- Disallowed goal by David B31/8/2014 22:42Sun Aug 31 22:42:45 2014
- Re; Bogey team wins again by mike cox31/8/2014 17:35Sun Aug 31 17:35:28 2014
- Bogey Team by Jeff Hill31/8/2014 00:02Sun Aug 31 00:02:08 2014
- Albert Einstein by rwakeley31/8/2014 02:25Sun Aug 31 02:25:07 2014