ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on forum.hendonfc.net

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Waffle time - Part 3- Quantity vs Quality by rwakeley16/1 15:19Sat Jan 16 15:19:04 2021view thread

Oldest article: eProgrammes by John Rice22/8/2013 14:09Thu Aug 22 14:09:21 2013view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: 34 years ago by dw15/9/2013 20:50Sun Sep 15 20:50:18 2013view thread

Re: Should have had 5 or 6

By SteveHFC (legacy user)10/9/2013 13:06Tue Sep 10 13:06:08 2013In response to Should have had 5 or 6

Views: 3347

Agree that we should have had 5 or 6, if not more. I thought Jefferson had his best game for the club so far - not just because of his goals, but his general effort and workrate for the full 90 minutes.

Harrow's problem will be defensively - with the exception of Michael Peacock - they were poor at the back, not much better in midfield, but actually pretty decent going forward, although did anyone notice Leroy Griffiths (their 9) do anything of note? I thought we defended well, despite appearing to be cut to shreds at times - we recovered well on a number of occasions.

If that does turn out to be Junior and Lee's last game for us (I am awaiting confirmation one way or the other over the next 2-3 days before we say anything officially - their loans officially end on Thursday) then they've gone out on a high note - and I wish them well for the future.

Greensnet - The Official Hendon FC Website
Hendon FC Supporters Trust Official Website

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Should have had 5 or 6 by Paul Butler10/9/2013 12:57Tue Sep 10 12:57:13 2013

Previous thread: Website Outage by SteveHFC7/9/2013 22:35Sat Sep 7 22:35:30 2013view thread